site stats

Guo v. ashcroft

WebJun 13, 2024 · Guo v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1194, 1203 (9th Cir. 2004); see also Aden, 989 F.3d at 1082–84 (distinguishing Gu, 545 F.3d at 1020, where Aden was physically assaulted only once but also received repeated threats within the context of “political and social turmoil” in Somalia). Further, “it is the conduct of the persecutor” that is ... WebJun 10, 2004 · Singh v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 1164, 1168 (9th Cir.2004). The IJ's decision may be reversed only if the evidence presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could find that the petitioner was not credible. Id. ... Guo, 361 F.3d at 1201; see also Sidhu, 220 F.3d at 1091-92(noting that an affidavit from someone living outside the ...

PRECEDENTIAL - United States Courts

Webv. Ashcroft, 239 F.3d 542, 549 (3d Cir. 2001). The Fifth Amendment thus guarantees aliens who are seeking to ... Guo v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 556, 564-65 (3d Cir. 2004). While not sufficient on its own to establish eligibility for asylum, substantial evidence of past persecution “triggers a rebuttable ... WebFeb 28, 2024 · 例如,Guo等人[50]在自支撑的BFO薄膜中,通过宏观挠曲电效应和光伏效应实现了对光电流的连续调控。 自支撑的BFO薄膜不同程度的弯曲可以连续且大范围地改变其中挠曲电场的强度,因此改变了BFO薄膜内部的能带结构,连续地调控出了多态光电流和光 … deadpool clothing for kids https://plurfilms.com

In re C-C-, Respondent - United States Department …

WebJun 29, 2004 · Zubeda v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 463, 469 (3d Cir.2003). A primary means of showing that fear is genuine is with credible testimony. Guo's statement that … WebApr 10, 2024 · Jian Lian GUO, Petitioner v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States Respondent. No. 03-2972. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. … WebJul 21, 2006 · In Guo v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1194 (9th Cir.2004), the asylum applicant was arrested while he was in church. During his day-and-a-half-long detention, Guo (not to be confused with Xiaoguang Gu, the petitioner in the instant case), was struck in the face, kicked in the stomach, required to perform repeated pushups and forced to sign a … deadly class watch online

Yasin v. Attorney General United States, No. 20-2509 (3d Cir.

Category:GUO v. ASHCROFT 386 F.3d 556 (2004) 6f3d5561888

Tags:Guo v. ashcroft

Guo v. ashcroft

Guo v. Ashcroft, No. 03-2972. - Federal Cases - Case Law - VLEX …

WebSee, e.g., Cai v. Ashcroft, 63 Fed.Appx. 625 (3d Cir. 2003) (remanding to the Board for reconsideration of a denial of asylum based on China's family planning policy where the … WebJan 13, 2015 · Guo v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 556 (3d Cir. 2004), distinguished. ... (Supp. V 1993), if the notice requirements of that section have been satisfied, absent a showing that the alien's failure to timely depart the United States was due to "exceptional circumstances" under section 242B(f)(2) of the Act. ...

Guo v. ashcroft

Did you know?

WebJul 30, 2024 · (quoting Kotasz v. INS, 31 F.3d 847, 851 (9th Cir. 1994)). “We look at the totality of the circumstances in deciding whether a finding of persecution is compelled.” Guo v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1194, 1203 (9th Cir. 2004). III. ANALYSIS A. Asylum and withholding of removal “To be statutorily eligible for asylum, [a petitioner] must WebJul 25, 2014 · Guo v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 556 (3d Cir. 2004), distinguished. FOR RESPONDENT: Peter D. Lobel, Esquire, New York, New York . BEFORE: Board Panel: …

WebJun 29, 2004 · GUO v. ASHCROFT. No. 03-2972. Jian Lian GUO, Petitioner v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States Respondent. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued June 29, 2004. Filed October 25, 2004. WebMar 23, 2004 · Jian GUO, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 02-73527. Decided: March 23, 2004 Before: ALARCÓN, BEEZER, and W. …

WebThe IJ found that Mr. Guo's second detention did not bear a nexus to Mr. Guo's practice of religion, and thus could not constitute persecution. The IJ focused on Mr. Guo's attempt … WebJul 30, 2024 · Guo v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1194, 1203 (9th Cir. 2004). III. ANALYSIS. A. Asylum and withholding of removal "To be statutorily eligible for asylum, [a petitioner] must show that he is a refugee." Baghdasaryan v. Holder, 592 F.3d 1018, 1022-23 (9th Cir. 2010) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)). "A refugee is one who is 'unable or unwilling to avail ...

WebDec 20, 2024 · Guo v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 556, 562 (3d Cir. 2004). “As a general rule, motions to reopen are granted only under compelling circumstances,” id. at 561, and we will not disturb the BIA’s “[d]iscretionary decisions . . . unless they are found to be arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law,” id. at 562 (quoting Tipu v.

WebGuo v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1194 (9th Cir. 2004) Ma v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 553 (9th Cir. 2004) Li v. Ashcroft, 356 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir. 2004) ... Camposeco-Montejo v. Ashcroft, 384 F.3d 814 (9th Cir. 2004) Garcia-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir. 2004) Lopez v. Ashcroft, 366 F.3d 799 (9th Cir. 2004) deadshot bagWebFeb 13, 2004 · Singh v. Ashcroft, 301 F.3d 1109, 1111 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Chebchoub, 257 F.3d at 1043) (alterations in original). Mr. Guo testified that he did not work for the … deadpool\\u0027s first appearance on tvWebSep 11, 2024 · Guo, 897 F.3d at 1213-17 (finding petitioner suffered past persecution because of his religious beliefs where he was detained, beaten, forced to sign a document promising not to attend a home church, and required to report to the police weekly); see also Guo v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1194, 1203 (9th Cir. 2004) (totality of deadstock fabric stores near meWebGet free access to the complete judgment in GUO v. ASHCROFT on CaseMine. deadshot toysWebJun 29, 2004 · In Guo v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 556, 565 (3d Cir. 2004), the Third Circuit addressed the evidentiary impact of a similar affidavit Aird submitted criticizing the 1998 … deadpool suits for saleWebOct 22, 2007 · Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 556, 562 (2004). As such, these determinations “ ‘will not be disturbed unless they are found to be arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to the law.’ ” Guo, 386 F.3d at 562 (quoting Tipu v. deadpool angel dust characterWebGuo v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 556, 562 (3d Cir. 2004). “As a general rule, motions to reopen are granted only under compelling circumstances,” id. at 561, and we will not disturb the BIA’s “[d]iscretionary decisions . . . unless they are found to be arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law,” id. at 562 (quoting Tipu v. deadwood jedi maneater tower